← Back to web reportFive A4 pages, in colour. Still readable as a black-and-white photocopy.
SAMPLE DATATEAM REPORT
Relationships and clarity
A snapshot of your team, to read together
TEAM
Team Logistica
Cartiera Levante S.r.l.
COLLECTION WINDOW
6 – 20 July 2026
ANSWERS
8 / 8
FORM
45 items · with OC module
LANGUAGE
English
GENERATED
6 August 2026
IMPROVEMENT FOCUS
Focus & Prioritize
Relationships are a solid base; clarity on goals, roles and processes is the ground to work on first.
Instrument undergoing psychometric validation: read these results as a description to discuss, not as a measurement.
CRF — free research instrument · Luca Troso · crf.lucatroso.it · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.217743035-page document · CRF v1.0
CLARITY-RELATIONSHIP FRAMEWORK · TEAM REPORT2 / 5
BEFORE READING THE NUMBERS
What this report is
What it is
It is the aggregate return of an anonymous questionnaire completed by the people in your team. Every number is a group mean on a 1–7 scale: no individual answer is visible here, and none can be reconstructed from this data.
What it is for
To give you a shared starting point for a conversation usually held from memory. It shows where to look first — not what to do. The decisions stay yours: the report informs them, it does not replace them.
Where it comes from
From the Clarity-Relationship Framework, a research model crossing two dimensions: relationship quality in the team, and clarity of goals, roles and processes. The model is published open access (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21774303) and is undergoing psychometric validation.
How to read it together
One hour, with the whole team. Start from the improvement focus on the cover, then go down to the facets: the two or three lowest ones are questions, not diagnoses. Close by deciding one single thing to try before the next survey.
What it is not
It is not an assessment of people, nor of the manager. It is not comparable with other teams and produces no rankings or benchmarks. It does not measure performance: the perceived outcomes are perceptions internal to the team, not verified results.
If a number surprises you, the useful question is not “who answered that way?” but “what makes it possible in the way we work?”.
How to read: team means on a 1–7 scale, two decimals. No individual answer is visible or reconstructable. Descriptive thresholds: 4.0 on the quadrant axes; OCL bands at 3.5 and 4.5. Scores within ±0.25 of a boundary should be read as “borderline”, not as clear membership.
CRF — free research instrument · Luca Troso · crf.lucatroso.it · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.217743032 / 5
CLARITY-RELATIONSHIP FRAMEWORK · TEAM REPORT3 / 5
Team Logistica — Cartiera Levante S.r.l.
Generated 6 August 2026 · Window: 6 – 20 July 2026 · 8 of 8 members responded · 45 items · with OC module · Report language: English
IMPROVEMENT FOCUS
Focus & Prioritize
Relationships are a solid base; clarity on goals, roles and processes is the ground to work on first.
Relationship Quality
on a 1–7 scale · team mean
5.12
Team Clarity
on a 1–7 scale · team mean
3.68
↑ Team Clarity (TCL)Relationship Quality (REL) →
Q1 · Align & Connect
Q2 · Focus & Prioritize ← here
Q3 · Collaborate & Strengthen
Q4 · Experiment & Innovate
ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT INDICATOR (OCL)
Describes how readable the organizational context is for the team. It sits beside the quadrant, not inside: it is not a third axis nor a total score.
4.21Intermediate context clarity
low clarity · < 3.5clear · ≥ 4.5
CRF — free research instrument · Luca Troso · crf.lucatroso.it · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.217743033 / 5
CLARITY-RELATIONSHIP FRAMEWORK · TEAM REPORT4 / 5
FACET PROFILES
Relationship Quality (REL)
Trust5.34
Psychological safety5.61
Communication & collaboration4.88
Conflict management4.72
Cohesion & belonging5.42
Collective emotional intelligence4.75
Team Clarity (TCL)
Goal clarity3.29
Role clarity3.71
Process clarity4.04
Organizational Context (OCL)
Strategic communication4.42
Decision transparency3.75
Goal alignment4.46
PERCEIVED OUTCOMES (GO)Internal perception · not a performance measure
4.55
Goal definition4.38
Goal achievement4.72
3.92
OPTIONAL MODULE · WORD-ACTION COHERENCE
Outside the quadrant and outside the context indicator. Exploratory reading: useful as a discussion topic.
Full form. The two questionnaire forms are not comparable with each other: scores from a short survey do not sit next to those from a full one.
CRF — free research instrument · Luca Troso · crf.lucatroso.it · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.217743034 / 5
CLARITY-RELATIONSHIP FRAMEWORK · TEAM REPORT5 / 5
TREND OVER TIME
3 surveys so far, to be read as a direction
The comparison is between team means, not between the same people: who responds changes from one window to the next. It shows a direction, it does not certify progress.
↑ Team Clarity (TCL)Relationship Quality (REL) →
Surveys so far
July 2025 · 7/8REL 4.42 · TCL 3.15
January 2026 · 6/8REL 4.81 · TCL 3.42
July 2026 · 8/8REL 5.12 · TCL 3.68
What changed, facet by facet
Indifference zone: any change within ±0.30 is written as “stable”, even when the number moves.
Trust↑ +0.36
Psychological safety→ +0.06
Communication & collaboration↑ +0.44
Conflict management→ -0.08
Cohesion & belonging→ +0.22
Collective emotional intelligence→ -0.15
Goal clarity→ +0.24
Role clarity↑ +0.43
Process clarity→ +0.10
Strategic communication→ -0.18
Decision transparency↓ -0.45
Goal alignment→ +0.11
How to read the trend: with 8 respondents, a small difference can come from chance or simply from someone else answering. None of these changes is a statistical test and none proves causation. Treat them as questions to bring into a meeting, not as grades.
CONTACTS
luca@lucatroso.it · lucatroso.it · linkedin.com/in/lucatroso
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21774303 · Paper CC BY 4.0 · Instrument CC BY-NC 4.0 · 5 / 5